He's held cash for about 3 months now, as he typically likes to hold cash over the summer. He shuffled a few things around.
Continues to believe that certain tech stocks (Mag 7) are way overvalued. So he's been trying to go into whatever is not in that category -- value stocks, commodities, etc.
His team thinks so. An object in motion tends to stay in motion until it doesn't.
There's a lot of flow coming into the market. Part of that may be because a lot of market participants don't want to be in the bond market -- returns are low, perhaps not better than inflation, and could be facing a loss if interest rates do go up. Part of it could be FOMO, because the last 2 years have been great, and now European and Canadian markets are really shining. Third thing is margin debt; in the US, it's almost back to the record levels seen in 2021 before the huge S&P correction from 4800 to below 4000.
He's cautiously optimistic. Short term, markets may need a bit of a pullback. We have PCE numbers coming out tomorrow in the US. Next Friday, September 5, we have the labour report for August and we'll see how the market reacts. Then we're back into earnings season in October.
We need to make a distinction, because there are some great bargains in that sector. NVDA is the poster child; it's gone up a lot, and its valuation is probably 40x forward PE. That's quite expensive, unless you believe that they can maintain the treadmill of that kind of growth. He's not saying the growth is over, just that maybe the growth slows down from here. Perhaps the valuation on this type of name has to stay here while earnings catch up, or it has to come down a little bit.
Doesn't mean that capital can't rotate into other parts of the AI growth market, or even into NVDA's competitors which have lower multiples. See his Top Picks.
Quite in line with what was expected. We shouldn't be distracted by that. It will lead to more accommodation and more robust business growth down the road.
When you're in a situation where you've had higher interest rates, it does slow the economy. There's a great deal of growth and opportunity coming from our neighbour to the south. Because we're a resource-rich nation, and if we can get less carbon-embarrassed and more pro-resource, it puts us in a very good spot as we go through the tidal wave of innovation that's going to manifest in some sort of physical infrastructure (data centres, power sources, AI and digital asset booms). Things that were more software-oriented are going to become more hardware-oriented. We'll go "from software to steel".
Crisis necessitates change.
US administration is undertaking a coordinated program to achieve its goals. US used to control the currency. With rising debt and rising China power, that's going to fade. Nations are going to want to price things in other than US dollars. This takes away from the USD. But the US has a plan for that -- if you can't control the currency, control the protocol (that is, control the commerce through digital assets and AI). Data centres and power for AI will need to be created, and US will see deregulation to bring down barriers for resource development.
All this will benefit Canada in a big way, if we can just get out of our own way. We'll be forced to do that. It has to be done and it's economic. Sets up NA as a global head of commerce. It's a pretty bullish scenario.
Market Update
Canada’s tech job market has gone from boom to bust in a matter of years, as August job openings in the sector were down 19 percent from the early 2020 levels. While the CIBC economics published a report showing that unemployment among 15- to 24-year-olds has climbed to the levels typically seen only during recessionary periods. The Canadian dollar was 72.72 cents USD. The U.S. S&P 500 ended the week flat, while the TSX was up 0.6%.
It was a mixed week of greens and reds. Financials and Materials rose 1.4%, each, while energy gained 1.1%. Consumer discretionary dropped by 1.3%, while consumer staples and real estate slid by 1.2%, each. Technology and industrials ended the week lower by 0.9% and 0.8%, respectively. The most heavily traded shares by volume were Toronto-Dominion Bank (TD), Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM), and Royal Bank of Canada (RY).
Dollar-Cost Averaging vs. Lump Sum Investing:
The DCA approach is when cash is invested in equal amounts over a specified time frame or investing a fixed amount from one’s paycheck. An example of what this could look like is if an investor has $100,000 to invest. Instead of putting that whole amount immediately into their portfolio, under a DCA strategy the investor could put $10,000 in at the start of every month for the next ten months, disregarding the price of the desired securities. This approach is ideal for risk averse investors concerned with downside risk and wanting to spread out the timing of investments. If prices drop immediately after the first installment, this approach is beneficial as investors can lower their average cost of shares.
Looking at an LS investment strategy, it is much simpler where the desired full amount of cash is immediately invested. Continuing the previous example of having $100,000 to invest, this would be immediately deployed into the investor’s portfolio/desired securities all in one installment. LS is beneficial for long-term investors who benefit from the potential for higher gains in a market upturn over a DCA investor.
LS investing offers higher upside potential and typically outperforms a DCA investment strategy. Since markets generally display growth in the long-run, investors adopting an LS strategy benefit by injecting their capital in one installment versus incrementally deploying it. Many empirical studies have found this true with LS investing, on average, producing higher annualized returns.
Unlock Premium - Try 5i Free